Tech debt is simply unavoidable. The problem here is not eliminating debt, but rather handling it well. When an assignment commences, the dev team doesn’t has a complete hold on the totality of the trouble. This is the basic of the letdown of the software development waterfall model, which postulates that all the requisitions are decide before the commencement of designs, which eventually can be completed before the implementation of the system. The argument appears nice: but the expenses needed to make an amendment rise up exponentially with the development of the system.
So, the best path is to change it in the early stages only before moving ahead. The truth is that the requirements keep on changing. Thus, it is better to go for a working prototype so that the clients and you always have a gaining experience with the project. Agile programming accepts that some tech debt is inevitable but also instructs a remediation procedure.
As important as tech debt may seem, it is very important that the strategic parts are promptly repaid. With the passage of time, programmers are transferred to the other companies and the people who were to ready for different compromises to move ahead to new projects, substituted by the others who do not look it in the similar way. Failed attempt to document the primary prototype could be a good compromise but it the longer it takes, the harder it gets to write.
Some types of tech debt are so costly that they should be avoided as much as possible. Security is a place where any shortcut could lead to a big disaster. You do not wish to say “you are writing passwords in the clear but someday, you will have to change it to challenge response”. This sure is a disaster recipe that no one but only you can see. You also need to avoid shortcuts in coding. However, in certain cases, where you have no choice, make sure you have a journal of debts which needs to be cleared before release.
Release cycles also make a great different in the disposal and acquisition of tech debt. The new trend of releasing early and frequently has made it much simpler to handle tech debt but to resolve it. Tech debt when well-managed could be a blessing as it allows you to release more functionality before time, by permitting instant feedback from the clients, leading to a product which is more responsive to client needs. If you do not clear the debt instantly, it compounds quickly.
One thing to remember is that inefficient resolutions could cost your company a bigger amount- for instance, server farm rental charges. Remember, not all debt occurs due to the laziness of the programmer. Some are charged by the management, others by the departments, especially when they do not have knowledge about how malicious the debt could be!
Tech debt occurs in many ways and is continuous. It can occur from designing, execution phases or in the operational stage. You need to know how to manage it at different points. Visit here to find out how to manage tech debt at different stages.